Skip to main content
Easler Law PLLC 321-206-3603
Real Estate
Andrew David Easler, Esq. Published October 22, 2026

Treasury Proposes Rules for Large Investor Home Purchase Ban Taking Effect January 7, 2027


On October 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury released a proposed rule interpreting section 1001 of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, which bars large institutional investors from buying single-family homes. The proposal is scheduled for publication in the Federal Register on October 23, 2026, with comments due 30 days after publication. The statutory ban itself takes effect January 7, 2027.

What the ROAD Act Prohibits Starting January 7, 2027

Section 1001 of the ROAD Act was enacted on July 11, 2026. Its requirements take effect 180 days later, on January 7, 2027. From that date, a large institutional investor may not purchase, or contract to purchase, a single-family home directly or indirectly unless the purchase fits a statutory exception.

The Act generally defines a large institutional investor as a for-profit entity in the business of investing in, owning, renting, managing or holding single-family homes that has investment control of at least 350 single-family homes. Homes bought in an excepted purchase after enactment do not count toward that total. The prohibition applies nationwide, including to home sales in Brevard County.

Terms and Exceptions the Proposed Rule Would Clarify

The proposal would add a new Part 36 to Title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations. It explains terms the Act uses but does not define, such as "program," "engaged in the business of" and "passive investor." Each exception that relies on a program would require written policies adopted before any purchase under that program.

The main exceptions addressed include:

  • Build-to-rent programs, covering homes never occupied by an owner-occupant, bought within 18 months after the certificate of occupancy, and first occupied by renters.

  • Renovate-to-rent programs, covering homes that fail structural or core system elements of local building codes, where the investor fixes all material deficiencies and spends at least 15 percent of the home's purchase price on improvements.

  • Homeownership programs and programs to boost homeownership, which require rental contracts with terms such as positive rent reporting, a renter's right to buy or right of first refusal, and meaningful financial support toward a purchase.

  • Purchases tied to debts previously contracted, loss mitigation by mortgage servicers and lenders, and purchases from another large institutional investor that owned the home on the enactment date or bought it in compliance with the Act.

The proposal also states that an entity holding homes only temporarily and incidentally for a different bona fide business is not in the business of holding single-family homes. A fee-based property manager without primary authority over material management decisions would not count as a large institutional investor.

Enforcement and Penalties Under Section 1001

The Act allows Treasury, or the Department of Justice at Treasury's request, to seek a civil penalty of up to the greater of $1 million per violation or three times the purchase price of the property. The proposed rule would treat one prohibited purchase involving several large institutional investors as a single violation when calculating that maximum.

The Act separately requires large institutional investors to file an annual notice with the Department of Housing and Urban Development about the homes they control. HUD will set the form of that notice, and this proposal does not address it.

Implications for Homebuyers, Sellers and Investors

Treasury describes the proposal as the first phase of a phased rulemaking. It expects later rules on other exception categories, compliance procedures, reporting, recordkeeping and enforcement actions.

For individual buyers and sellers, the Act does not restrict purchases by people or by entities below the 350 home threshold. Funds, investment managers, builders and lenders that hold or finance large numbers of single-family homes are the groups most directly affected.

How to Comment on the Treasury Proposal

Treasury accepts written comments through regulations.gov under docket TREAS-DO-2026-0529, or by mail to its Office of Capital Markets. Comments should be captioned "Restrictions on Large Institutional Investor Purchases of Single-Family Homes" and become part of the public record.

The proposal poses specific questions to the public, including whether the safe harbor amounts for renter financial support are appropriate and how penalties should apply when several investors take part in one purchase.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice tailored to your circumstances.

References

321-206-3603