Logo

Published: Apr 22, 2021

Updated: Dec 8, 2023

The Decision in Google v. Oracle

[1] See Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., 593 U. S. _ (20). [2] Id. [3] See Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 at 579 (1994). [4] See Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 at 349-350 (1991). [5] Brief for 83 Computer Scientists as Amici Curiae 20. [6] See Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 at 586 (1994). [7] See Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc., 49 F.3d 807 at 809 (1st Cir. 1995). [8] See Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 at 564-565 (1985). [9] See Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 at 588 (1994). [10] See Oracle Am., Inc. v. Google Inc., 886 F.3d 1179 at 1187 (Fed. Cir. 2018). [11] See Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 at 586 (1994). [12] 17 U. S. C. §107(4). [13] See MCA, Inc. v. Wilson, 677 F. 2d 180 at 183 (CA2 1981). [14] See Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. Accolade, Inc., 977 F.2d 1510 at 1523–1524 (9th Cir. 1992). [15] Constitution Art. I, §8, cl. 8.

Disclaimer

We give great legal advice, but this page (and the rest of our site) is for informational use only and is no substitute for actual legal advice. If you’d like to establish an attorney-client relationship, reach out to us and we’ll tell you how we can make it official. Sending us an email or reading this page alone doesn’t mean we represent you.

People ask

Need more help?
Schedule a consultation

Our consultations provide potential clients with valuable legal advice and information because the attorney assigned to your consultation will take time to review the information you provide before your consultation. This preparation allows our attorneys to deliver excellent value for your time.

Search pages, our insights, and more all from one place